<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Andrew M. Hahn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmhahn.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmhahn.com</link>
	<description>» designer &#38; art director</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter background problems? by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2009/10/twitter-background-problems/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circa42.com/?p=701#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Supraket: Thanks for your suggestions. I actually do use Photoshop and am very familiar with &#039;Save to Web&#039; feature—I believe this is a flaw on twitter&#039;s side. I have seen, in some instances, traditional print designers simply do a &#039;Save As...&#039; to JPG without doing a color conversion from CMYK to RGB which will give the recipient of the file a lot of grief when they try and open it. 

By the way, I haven&#039;t changed my background on twitter for some time now...is this still an issue with people?

But in any case, thanks for your input!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supraket: Thanks for your suggestions. I actually do use Photoshop and am very familiar with &#8216;Save to Web&#8217; feature—I believe this is a flaw on twitter&#8217;s side. I have seen, in some instances, traditional print designers simply do a &#8216;Save As&#8230;&#8217; to JPG without doing a color conversion from CMYK to RGB which will give the recipient of the file a lot of grief when they try and open it. </p>
<p>By the way, I haven&#8217;t changed my background on twitter for some time now&#8230;is this still an issue with people?</p>
<p>But in any case, thanks for your input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter background problems? by Supraket</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2009/10/twitter-background-problems/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Supraket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circa42.com/?p=701#comment-272</guid>
		<description>The real reason why this happens is because the background image you use, is not suitable to be used in for Web. And hence the best solution for this is to import the image on Photoshop (yes, you&#039;ll need it), take the canvas size of your monitor resolution (Here&#039;s how to find out - Control Panel &gt; Display &gt; Adjust Resolution), resize your image to be used as background and then save the image as &quot;Save for Web &amp; Devices&quot; (Ctrl + Shift + Alt) and select the file type as JPEG, keeping rest of the settings as it is. Your file size will become incredibly low, plus, you dont have to go through these tactics!
Enjoy! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason why this happens is because the background image you use, is not suitable to be used in for Web. And hence the best solution for this is to import the image on Photoshop (yes, you&#8217;ll need it), take the canvas size of your monitor resolution (Here&#8217;s how to find out &#8211; Control Panel &gt; Display &gt; Adjust Resolution), resize your image to be used as background and then save the image as &#8220;Save for Web &amp; Devices&#8221; (Ctrl + Shift + Alt) and select the file type as JPEG, keeping rest of the settings as it is. Your file size will become incredibly low, plus, you dont have to go through these tactics!<br />
Enjoy! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Efficient vs Human by Jess Ostroff</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2011/06/efficient-vs-human/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Ostroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmhahn.com/?p=1187#comment-250</guid>
		<description>YES. Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES. Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smooth Sailing by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2011/06/smooth-sailing/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmhahn.com/?p=1159#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Good thinking. Done and done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thinking. Done and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smooth Sailing by Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2011/06/smooth-sailing/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmhahn.com/?p=1159#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew,

if there is a sharing option in your blog , it will be great..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>if there is a sharing option in your blog , it will be great..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 15 Minutes by Jess Ostroff</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2011/05/15-minutes/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Ostroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmhahn.com/?p=1154#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Oh yay you&#039;re doing it too! I&#039;m excited to have a good reason to write and more excited that other people I know are doing it. I&#039;m scared, too. Today&#039;s prompt was pretty deep and it&#039;s only day 1... 

Here&#039;s to the next 29 days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yay you&#8217;re doing it too! I&#8217;m excited to have a good reason to write and more excited that other people I know are doing it. I&#8217;m scared, too. Today&#8217;s prompt was pretty deep and it&#8217;s only day 1&#8230; </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to the next 29 days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How a poor response can give your brand a black eye by Are You Monitoring Review Sites?</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2011/01/how-a-poor-response-can-give-your-brand-a-black-eye/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Are You Monitoring Review Sites?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmhahn.com/?p=937#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] found this via Andrew M Hahn and it brilliantly illustrates the importance, first of all, of monitoring review sites, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found this via Andrew M Hahn and it brilliantly illustrates the importance, first of all, of monitoring review sites, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Four marketing tactics you can use on your kids by Trevor</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2010/05/four-marketing-tactic-you-can-use-on-your-kids/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circa42.com/?p=851#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I think in the past I would have agreed with all of this and I think there is a place for such tactics, however I have been reading an author (John Rosemond) who talks about the need for leadership in the family and a tough love &quot;I said so&quot; approach. It makes a lot of sense.

For instance his son was having problems in school so he sat him down and said it&#039;s your job to do well in school - I&#039;m not going to check up on you for one month, but in that same month you are essentially grounded. In one month I will check with your teacher. Nothing more was ever said - In one month&#039;s time he checked with his teacher and his teacher said she had never seen such a dramatic turn-around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the past I would have agreed with all of this and I think there is a place for such tactics, however I have been reading an author (John Rosemond) who talks about the need for leadership in the family and a tough love &#8220;I said so&#8221; approach. It makes a lot of sense.</p>
<p>For instance his son was having problems in school so he sat him down and said it&#8217;s your job to do well in school &#8211; I&#8217;m not going to check up on you for one month, but in that same month you are essentially grounded. In one month I will check with your teacher. Nothing more was ever said &#8211; In one month&#8217;s time he checked with his teacher and his teacher said she had never seen such a dramatic turn-around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Four marketing tactics you can use on your kids by Unept</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2010/05/four-marketing-tactic-you-can-use-on-your-kids/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Unept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circa42.com/?p=851#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Love it. I should try some of these tactics, see how they compare with my regular parenting skills: Violence, Passive-Aggressiveness, Manipulation, Dungeons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it. I should try some of these tactics, see how they compare with my regular parenting skills: Violence, Passive-Aggressiveness, Manipulation, Dungeons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Decide: Specialize vs. Generalize by Leigh Durst</title>
		<link>http://andrewmhahn.com/2010/03/how-to-decide-specialize-vs-generalize/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Durst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circa42.com/?p=773#comment-19</guid>
		<description>@Aliza,

I guess I resonate with the topic of being a specialist in some areas -- and a generalist in others.

When it comes to several arenas within which I&#039;ve played  (CRM, Integrated Marketing, Operations, Business Strategy, Content Management)  I might be considered a generalist.  That is, I&#039;ve had exposure to enough things to understand all the moving parts well and know when to extend outside of myself to get narrower (read: almost always more junior OR someone highly technical) focus to make the project a success.

However, within the digital media arena - I am truly a specialist. That casts a wider net than it used to....  as technology advancement, adoption and channel proliferation, this arena is growingly complex.  I find that it&#039;s impossible to keep up at a granular level with all the areas of expansion... so in certain areas of digital media, I may choose to use more GRANULAR SME&#039;s (e.g. expert in video - and I have a degree in TV/film production) to ensure the best use of my time.

But I have to ask this:  Isn&#039;t that a normal part of being very senior in one&#039;s field?

While for the most part, I can execute, and often do .... I find my time is often better spent managiung at a higher level and hiring people to handle detailed execution (depending on the project). I often face the hard fact taht I have to bring in someone CHEAPER to execute the work... because the project financials can&#039;t afford that much of my time.

However, as an excellence junkie, I can&#039;t - and won&#039;t -  take myself out of the execution camp... I find it keeps me SHARP... on my toes, and constantly learning.  That is keeping in step with the fact that I love my work - I love this arena, and mostly -- I love to create experiences for customers (and clients) that are outstanding... so I take a high level of ownership.

So - am I at risk of seeming unfocused? Perhaps to people who don&#039;t understand why it&#039;s necessary in this field to be pretty darned good at a LOT of different things...

However, I&#039;m never sorry for it -- because I&#039;m not lying about my capabilities and my clients are usually more than happy to find a consultant that is agile, versatile and active in her field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aliza,</p>
<p>I guess I resonate with the topic of being a specialist in some areas &#8212; and a generalist in others.</p>
<p>When it comes to several arenas within which I&#8217;ve played  (CRM, Integrated Marketing, Operations, Business Strategy, Content Management)  I might be considered a generalist.  That is, I&#8217;ve had exposure to enough things to understand all the moving parts well and know when to extend outside of myself to get narrower (read: almost always more junior OR someone highly technical) focus to make the project a success.</p>
<p>However, within the digital media arena &#8211; I am truly a specialist. That casts a wider net than it used to&#8230;.  as technology advancement, adoption and channel proliferation, this arena is growingly complex.  I find that it&#8217;s impossible to keep up at a granular level with all the areas of expansion&#8230; so in certain areas of digital media, I may choose to use more GRANULAR SME&#8217;s (e.g. expert in video &#8211; and I have a degree in TV/film production) to ensure the best use of my time.</p>
<p>But I have to ask this:  Isn&#8217;t that a normal part of being very senior in one&#8217;s field?</p>
<p>While for the most part, I can execute, and often do &#8230;. I find my time is often better spent managiung at a higher level and hiring people to handle detailed execution (depending on the project). I often face the hard fact taht I have to bring in someone CHEAPER to execute the work&#8230; because the project financials can&#8217;t afford that much of my time.</p>
<p>However, as an excellence junkie, I can&#8217;t &#8211; and won&#8217;t &#8211;  take myself out of the execution camp&#8230; I find it keeps me SHARP&#8230; on my toes, and constantly learning.  That is keeping in step with the fact that I love my work &#8211; I love this arena, and mostly &#8212; I love to create experiences for customers (and clients) that are outstanding&#8230; so I take a high level of ownership.</p>
<p>So &#8211; am I at risk of seeming unfocused? Perhaps to people who don&#8217;t understand why it&#8217;s necessary in this field to be pretty darned good at a LOT of different things&#8230;</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m never sorry for it &#8212; because I&#8217;m not lying about my capabilities and my clients are usually more than happy to find a consultant that is agile, versatile and active in her field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

